| chris blinston tattoo :: champaign tattoo |
| Author |
Message |
Sherman
Guest
|
Posted: 10 16 2009 Post subject: celtic tattoo sydney |
|
|
Layout looks like something MySpace would do. Excuse me while I go slit my wrists.
And next week we'll have another article about "freeing corporate users" from the "iron fisted policies of bureaucratic IT departments". If people acted the same way towards the medical profession we'd have articles about "crappy doctors tell me not to eat the triple bacon cheeseburger, but it tastes good and I've never had an issue!"Next article: "Deaths shown to be preventable if only doctors could provide better care and guidance!"
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Paseda
Guest
|
Posted: 10 15 2009 Post subject: celtic pisces tattoo |
|
|
|
“See the first comment by irfanmp for an awesome modification that will let you do what you want from Canada.irfanmp ROCKS!
|
|
| Back to top |
|
MARIUS
Guest
|
Posted: 10 14 2009 Post subject: Online casinos free play |
|
|
@y0k4z3"bird + cat = ???""However where are we jumping from birds to cats (or how about birds to bats, at least they both fly)?"(BTW bats are mammals birds are not. The evolution of one did not lead to the other.)Oh for crying out loud! That isn't how it works. If you seriously expect a bird to give birth to a bat, you have ZERO/nill/null/0 understanding of evolution and how it works.Here is the evolution of the Horse, one of the most well documented evolutions we have complete with intermediate or "in-between steps" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evolution_of_the_hors ...Here is the evolution of Birds http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evolution_of_birds ever hear of a creature called Archaeopteryx? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ArchaeopteryxThe problem is you anti-evolution morons keep moving the goal-posts. You ask for intermediate forms, we show you intermediate forms, then you ask for the form in-between the one we just showed you and the present form, then you ask for the one in-between that and so on and so on Ad infinitum. We are lucky to have fossils at all! Fossils are extremely rare and incredibly difficult to form yet you idiots literally expect a fossil of every creature that ever lived.The one and only difference between micro- and macro- evolution is time. Cumulative changes over millions of years produce new species. To quote "rocknog" a fellow digger who earlier made this analogy between micro- and macro- evolution:"it's like saying "Oh sure, I acknowledge that we have the ability to walk, it's just that I don't believe anyone can walk from one end of the country to the other, no matter how many steps they take." The only separation between micro- and macro- evolution is time. Gradual Change over time. individuals don't evolve, populations evolve.If you want to disprove evolution they find what the scientists J.B.S. Haldane was describing. "If you want to disprove evolution find a rabbit in the Pre-Cambrian period." It is no accident that rabbits are not found in Pre-Cambrian layers, its because it took millions of years to evolve.Seriously go back to college, it sounds like you need it. Or at least do some reading. Don't criticize something you clearly know nothing about..
Are you serious? Is he serious? Did he just rag on all scientists from a computer invented by them? I'm avoiding this troll, it makes my head hurt.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/God_of_the_gaps!
|
|
| Back to top |
|
Decelis
Guest
|
Posted: 10 12 2009 Post subject: celtic pisces tattoo |
|
|
"their ratings suck and Fox News' commercials have better viewership and ratings"And watch as the nature and purpose of CBC goes "woosh!" right over your head! Ratings don't matter to public broadcasters, it's why they're so free to actually report things rather than pander to the paranoid ranting masses.?
KAPOW! That ex-boxer completely leveled him! |
|
| Back to top |
|
Ikey
Guest
|
Posted: 10 11 2009 Post subject: clark north tattoo artist |
|
|
...that's a huge upside. While 500 isn't within our lifetime, we're a lot more sure about geological conditions 500 years from now instead of 1,000,000 years, thus letting us store stuff in places we know will be somewhat how they are now versus trying to guess how something will be in a million years. 500 years is a blink in geological time.

|
|
| Back to top |
|
Kendra
Guest
|
Posted: 10 10 2009 Post subject: chakotay tattoo |
|
|
|
.. at "very high quality" in 1920x1200
|
|
| Back to top |
|
Kandey
Guest
|
Posted: 09 12 2009 Post subject: classic tattoo las vegas |
|
|
|
And don't forget the crazy bitch Ann Bressington he gave preferences to.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
Kaii
Guest
|
Posted: 09 09 2009 Post subject: celtic pisces tattoo |
|
|
|
!
|
|
| Back to top |
|
Juavie
Guest
|
I find it far more likely that a Libertarian would argue that the best remedy for rogue ISPs blocking their favorite traffic is market competition.For places that are free to choose between different ISPs (like cable vs. DSL) there is a strong incentive for ISPs to offer services that people actually like.For places where only 1 (evil) ISP exists, there is usually a strong incentive for another ISP to realize markets where people are unhappy and offer a better alternative.Furthermore, people in cities with only 1 cable or 1 telephone company that controls those respective intra-city lines, if they are angered enough by their ISPs, can initiate local measures to revoke the ISPs charter with the city and offer these contracts to other ISPs willing to offer services that the voters want.These are not always the best solutions. The question is whether having the federal government regulate the internet is a better solution than the free market one. Many of the founders of the the various technologies that power the internet to not favor Net Neutrality because they think it will stifle internet innovation. The sorts of regulations Net Neutrality wants to mandate would make new algorithms like "fair queuing" illegal for ISPs to implement. The government is just not tech savvy enough to regulate the specifics of internet protocols effectively. They will have a nearly impossible job legally differentiating between "fair" traffic shaping (like giving latency priority to voip traffic over data transfers) and unfair traffic shaping (like limiting the speed of bit torrent traffic). |
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
| 9 User(s) are reading this topic (8 Guests and 40 Anonymous Users) |
|
 |
|